Obbligazioni perpetue e subordinate Tutto quello che avreste sempre voluto sapere sulle obbligazioni perpetue... - Cap. 3 (11 lettori)

gionmorg

low cost high value
Membro dello Staff
EU Bank Stress Tests Delayed to 2014 on Asset-Quality Review


EU Bank Stress Tests Delayed to 2014 on ECB Asset-Quality Review

The European Union’s top banking regulator delayed stress tests until 2014, allowing time for a European Central Bank-led probe into the quality of assets held by some lenders in the debt-laden bloc.
The European Banking Authority said the ECB asset check will “help dispel concerns over the deterioration of asset quality due to macroeconomic conditions in Europe,” the London-based agency said in an e-mailed statement today. The EBA, set up in 2011 to harmonize rules across EU, will still publish details of bank holdings in the second half of this year.
The EBA carried out the last formal EU stress tests in 2011, which were criticized for failing to catch problems at the lenders. Eight banks failed the exams with a combined shortfall of 2.5 billion euros ($3.2 billion). Investors expected as many as 15 banks to fail and raise 29 billion euros after assessments, according to a survey by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) Dexia SA (DEXB), the French-Belgian lender, received a clean bill of health and then failed after a bank run three months later.
“Concerns remain on asset quality and forbearance, which need to be addressed,” Andrea Enria, chairman of the EBA, said in the statement. “This is also a necessary precondition for the credibility of the next EU-wide stress test.”
Eight Failures
The EBA told lenders last year in what it described as a capital-raising exercise to hold on to more than 200 billion euros in profits and investments accumulated to pave the way for tougher global standards, known as Basel III, and in response to concerns about the quality of their European sovereign bond portfolios.
The ECB is set to take on supervisory powers next year over all euro-area banks after legislation underpinning the system was endorsed by member states. The EBA said it is seeking “alignment in methodologies and timeline” with the ECB’s assessment.
“When the ECB takes over EU bank supervision, it will get what in the U.S. we call a pig in a poke,” Karen Shaw Petrou, managing partner of Washington-based Federal Financial Analytics Inc., said in an e-mailed statement.
“Banks are finally making some progress improving their capital, but asset quality is essentially a mystery at most EU banks, where rules treat sovereigns as flawless and borrowers as perfect up to the moment of default,” Petrou said.
27 Nations
Leaders of the bloc’s 27 nations agreed last year that the central bank should become a regulator in a bid to ease the euro area’s fiscal crisis by bolstering investor confidence and breaking the link between bank solvency and national public finances.
“We want to know what kinds of banks we supervise,” Joerg Asmussen, a member of the ECB executive board, told reporters on May 14. The review of balance sheets “will be done by the ECB together with national supervisors” and “it should be finished before the single supervisory mechanism starts,” Asmussen said.
The establishment of ECB supervision is a prerequisite for banks to receive direct aid from the European Stability Mechanism, the euro area’s bailout fund.
Financial ministers last month overcame German concerns about the supervisor plan by committing to “work constructively” on any proposals to amend the bloc’s treaties. German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble has said that the EU’s current rulebook has hampered the design of the ECB’s supervision arm, including in terms of separating oversight decisions from monetary policy.
The draft law stipulates that the ECB must carry out a “comprehensive assessment, including a balance-sheet assessment,” of any banks that it intends to directly supervise.
To contact the reporters on this story: Ben Moshinsky in London at [email protected];
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Anthony Aarons at [email protected]
 

capt.harlock

MENA IL CAMMELLO FAN CLUB
Secondo me sale :D, anche perché fino ad ora le quotazioni erano (esageratamente) basse per il rischio skip.

Se non salta quest'anno (per coupon pusher) dubito che avrà problemi gli anni prossimi, dopo i pesanti accantonamenti e le ricapitalizzazioni che hanno fatto.

E allora questi prezzi non sarebbero più giustificati.

P. S. Titolo rischiosissimo :lol:

mi sembra sia il ragionamento giusto, nonostante sara' ancora piu' illiquido e prezzo opa in ribasso (da 70vs66), e' da tenere, la paura dello skip cedola svanisce, road to 72 minimo

Rientrato solo adesso da intensa attività (trekking) vedo questa bella notizia.

Per me MPS ha i liquidi per poterlo fare anche lei (utili a buon mercato , penso che Bankitalia non si opporrebbe)
Segnalo che il LME dell'anno scorso, specialmente per le T1, fu un insuccesso (pochissimi aderirono) per MPS, magari quest'anno aderirebbero più possessori.

Non fosse il peggior IR (mai mi ha considerato, nemmeno quando scrivevo "da istituzionale" in inglese aspirato) una mail nella quale metto giù due conticini la invierei.

Hai ragione, titolo rischiosissimo(ma non solo lui ;)) il BP :D:D

Qualcuno sa come si sono mosse le UT2 in GBP di MPS ?

75,5/77
 

dierre

Forumer storico
Io intendevo il nominale in circolazione (nei portafogli di tutti i bondisti) non quanto il BP è disposto a riacquistare.... :)

Io credo sia proprio il nominale in cirolazione.

Cmq, il mio lotticino di 290 me lo tengo, PMC 63, anzi se per qualche motivo dovesse scendere, a questo punto incrementerei.


X NEGUS

Come vedi l'azione BP invece?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Alto