Previsione Mercati 2011 (1 Viewer)

lukas

Forumer storico
1288080932ust2y.png


Commentando questo grafico ( spx - titoli USA a 2 anni ), Vincent di B&B dice che secondo lui
i mercati saliranno anche nel prossimo anno,
perchè molti fondi sono ancora posizionati sui titoli USA e visto
che i rendimenti sono al minimo storico gireranno ingenti capitali sull'equity...esattamente come è successo nel 2003.

Io personalmente ho qualche dubbio ,
il primo è per il prezzo dell'equity , nel 2003 si trovava ancora vicino ai minimi mentre oggi si trova in cima ad un rally che ne ha quasi raddoppiato il valore

il secondo è dato dal fatto che i titoli di stato a confronto sono a 2 anni e possono essere preferiti come riserva di liquidità a breve scadenza , quindi non molto attendibili per l'AT .

L'AT proposta comunque è interessante e gradirei un vostro parere grazie

saluti a tutti
 

quicksilver

Forumer storico
è una questione di cicli economici, il rialzo non è ancora finito, consiglio di leggere pring-turner, fugnoli, e caruso per delucidazioni
 

aross

Nuovo forumer
Ciao Quiks, mi confermi che Pring parla di calo nell'ultimo trimestre 2010 (IMPROBABILE?) oppure nel primo trimestre 2011.
Grazie

Andrea
è una questione di cicli economici, il rialzo non è ancora finito, consiglio di leggere pring-turner, fugnoli, e caruso per delucidazioni
 

aross

Nuovo forumer
trovato una specie di link:
http://www.borsaefinanza.it/search....936835218f8079&TESTO=pring&range=999&x=14&y=6
AZZ"! ho letto meglio! il link più recente é di Nov 2009..

Attenzione: questo tizio è Martin Pring, Rettifico sul sito Pring Turner, si firma Martin J. Pring, per cui è il guru citato in B&F. Probabile quindi una reversal discesa nel primo trimestre?


sbirciato su Borsa e Finanza all'S lunga.. circa 3 settimane fa..
Non ho tempo, ma se vai sul sito di B&F credo che ci sia la possibilità di trovare almeno i titoli degli articoli, sulla base del nome del "guru".
Se trovi qualcosa..

Danke


 
Ultima modifica:

lukas

Forumer storico
è una questione di cicli economici, il rialzo non è ancora finito, consiglio di leggere pring-turner, fugnoli, e caruso per delucidazioni

ciao QuickS
Creare un metodo serve a far notizia e vendersi meglio , diversi cosidetti Gurù hanno creato un loro metodo.

in realtà ....Gli oscillatori sul mensile sono sempre in ritardo di diversi mesi , e se incrociano adesso al rialzo non è detto che non si scenda.

Quelli settimanali anche sono in ritardo di 5/8 ,anche di 10 giorni....

Chiedevo un commento sul grafico che ho postato , pensate anche voi che i gestori hanno ancora molte risorse da immettere sul mercato?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhtcaRRngcw]YouTube - When The Man Comes Around[/ame]
 

alingtonsky

Forumer storico
November 5, 2010, 7:10 pm EDT

A picture says more than a thousand words and the chart below does just that. Take a minute to study the chart, and you'll also learn that it takes only one picture to expel a myth, regardless of how pervasive it is.
The black line is the percentage increase of the Fed's adjusted monetary base since January 2007, or the amount the Fed has spent on quantitative easing and other fiscal maneuvers. According to the QE myth, a drastically rising monetary base will increase money supply and inflation.
The grey line is the M2 money supply. To compare apples to apples, M2 is also illustrated as percentage increase. The blue line is inflation measured by CPI.
There's really not much else to say about QE1. Of course, we could add an additional thousand words of CNBC-fluff-like analysis, but your time is better-spent examining other pressing QE related topics, like:
Did stocks rally because of QE1? Will stocks rally because of QE2?
Fed%20M2%20CPI.gif

Timing is Everything
The second chart (quantitative easing and the big picture) plots the S&P's performance against QE1

As you can see, QE1 came at a time (on March 18, 2009) when the S&P (SNP: ^GSPC) plummeted 57% from its October high. The Dow Jones (DJI: ^DJI), Nasdaq (Nasdaq: ^IXIC) and other broad market measures didn't fare any better.
Needless to say, the market was extremely oversold. After predicting a bottom target of Dow 6,700, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter issued a strong buy alert on March 2, 2009. Stocks bottomed on March 6. By March 18 (when QE1 became official), the S&P had already soared 20%.
QE2.gif


QE1 vs. QE2
Timing is probably the main difference between QE1 and QE2.
In terms of economic benchmarks, there hasn't been much improvement. Unemployment has risen from 8.6% in March 2009 to 9.6% (U-6 unemployment has gone from 15.6% to 17.1%). Real estate prices have failed to recover while consumer confidence is about at the same level today as it was in April 2009.
What has changed is the stock market. The S&P today is nearly 80% above its March 2009 low. In other words, QE1 was launched after the major indexes lost some 57% while QE2 will be released after stocks have already rallied 80%. You decide which environment is more conducive for higher prices.
What's Fueling the Stock and Commodity Rally?
If you are a one-word-explanation kind of a person, the answer is liquidity.
Fed-induced liquidity to be more accurate. Right now, banks (NYSEArca: KRE - News) and financial institutions (NYSEArca: XLF - News) are swimming in liquidity. Where does the liquidity come from?
It's a complicated process, here's the short version (the longer version was discussed in the November ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter):
Currently, banks are allowed to borrow money from the Fed at an interest rate of 0.25%. Of course, the average American can't borrow at 0.25%, but the biggest banks can.
Guaranteed Profits for Banks
With the borrowed money, banks buy Treasuries. Long-term Treasuries (NYSEArca: TLT - News) pay about 3.5%. This is a guaranteed profitable trade. Pay 0.25% - get 3.5%. There's no incentive for banks to provide risky loans to broke consumers if the government offers you a no-loss option.
In addition to the guaranteed margin profit, the Federal Reserve buys back Treasuries from banks via its Permanent Open Market Operations (POMO). Since Bond prices have gone up for most of the year, this is another profit source for banks. Buy low, sell high. Another government guaranteed trade.
Where do all the profits go? Look around! A rising tide lifts all boats. Domestic stocks, international stocks (NYSEArca: VEU - News), emerging market stocks (NYSEArca: EEM - News), broad bond funds (NYSEArca: AGG - News) and commodities (NYSEArca: DBC - News) are all up.
Fly in the Ointment
All things come to an end eventually. Even this perfectly legal and unethical enrichment cycle the banks are feasting on.
30-Year T-Bonds were the first to decouple themselves from the liquidity rally. They topped on August 25 and have been going down since. On that very day, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter stated that: 'Our technical analysis along with fundaments suggest that T-Bonds are getting ready to roll over.'
Shortly thereafter, Bill Gross stated that the 30-year bond bull market is over. Lower bond prices mean higher bond interest rates. When interest rates rise, investors become less inclined to 'gamble' with stocks.
And regarding the POMO repurchase profit racket, lower bond prices mean smaller profits for banks which translates into less money to drive up stocks and commodities. This alone probably won't be a big enough knock against the liquidity house of cards, but every crash has to start somewhere - bonds may be the beginning.
Gold, Silver, Commodities and Inflation
Throughout much of 2008, 2009 and 2010, gold, silver and stocks have been moving in the same direction. That direction was usually the opposite of the U.S. dollar. A weak dollar means rising stocks and vice versa.
If you look carefully, you'll see that the dollar has found support around current levels, which coincided with a correction in gold (NYSEArca: GLD - News) and silver (NYSEArca: SLV - News). In fact, gold has been correcting even though stocks have continued to rise. It's said that a fragmented market is an unhealthy market.
This doesn't mean the patient (= various markets) can't live (= rise) longer, but it is an early warning sign.
Short-Term Effects of QE2
Leading up to today's Fed meeting, stocks have been rallying. If you believe 'buy the rumor and sell the news' will be the case, that's exactly the behavior you'd expect to see. Once the news is released, the big question is whether investors feel they actually got the steak or just the sizzle.
Sentiment is extreme enough where a 'sizzle-induced' disappointment could lead to a correction - a correction bigger than many expect.
Of course, there are many who believe that the ueber-bullish presidential election year cycle (October ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter, page 4) will kick in and propel stocks for the foreseeable future.
Either way, we find ourselves at a very important juncture. The stock market has drawn a few lines in the sand, or trigger levels. A breakout above trigger levels will lead to the next resistance, while a drop below support may open the floodgates.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/The-Pros-and-Cons-of-etfguide-4227155225.html?x=0&.v=1


http://www.microsofttranslator.com/
 

lukas

Forumer storico
November 5, 2010, 7:10 pm EDT

A picture says more than a thousand words and the chart below does just that. Take a minute to study the chart, and you'll also learn that it takes only one picture to expel a myth, regardless of how pervasive it is.
The black line is the percentage increase of the Fed's adjusted monetary base since January 2007, or the amount the Fed has spent on quantitative easing and other fiscal maneuvers. According to the QE myth, a drastically rising monetary base will increase money supply and inflation.
The grey line is the M2 money supply. To compare apples to apples, M2 is also illustrated as percentage increase. The blue line is inflation measured by CPI.
There's really not much else to say about QE1. Of course, we could add an additional thousand words of CNBC-fluff-like analysis, but your time is better-spent examining other pressing QE related topics, like:
Did stocks rally because of QE1? Will stocks rally because of QE2?
Fed%20M2%20CPI.gif

Timing is Everything
The second chart (quantitative easing and the big picture) plots the S&P's performance against QE1

As you can see, QE1 came at a time (on March 18, 2009) when the S&P (SNP: ^GSPC) plummeted 57% from its October high. The Dow Jones (DJI: ^DJI), Nasdaq (Nasdaq: ^IXIC) and other broad market measures didn't fare any better.
Needless to say, the market was extremely oversold. After predicting a bottom target of Dow 6,700, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter issued a strong buy alert on March 2, 2009. Stocks bottomed on March 6. By March 18 (when QE1 became official), the S&P had already soared 20%.
QE2.gif


QE1 vs. QE2
Timing is probably the main difference between QE1 and QE2.
In terms of economic benchmarks, there hasn't been much improvement. Unemployment has risen from 8.6% in March 2009 to 9.6% (U-6 unemployment has gone from 15.6% to 17.1%). Real estate prices have failed to recover while consumer confidence is about at the same level today as it was in April 2009.
What has changed is the stock market. The S&P today is nearly 80% above its March 2009 low. In other words, QE1 was launched after the major indexes lost some 57% while QE2 will be released after stocks have already rallied 80%. You decide which environment is more conducive for higher prices.
What's Fueling the Stock and Commodity Rally?
If you are a one-word-explanation kind of a person, the answer is liquidity.
Fed-induced liquidity to be more accurate. Right now, banks (NYSEArca: KRE - News) and financial institutions (NYSEArca: XLF - News) are swimming in liquidity. Where does the liquidity come from?
It's a complicated process, here's the short version (the longer version was discussed in the November ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter):
Currently, banks are allowed to borrow money from the Fed at an interest rate of 0.25%. Of course, the average American can't borrow at 0.25%, but the biggest banks can.
Guaranteed Profits for Banks
With the borrowed money, banks buy Treasuries. Long-term Treasuries (NYSEArca: TLT - News) pay about 3.5%. This is a guaranteed profitable trade. Pay 0.25% - get 3.5%. There's no incentive for banks to provide risky loans to broke consumers if the government offers you a no-loss option.
In addition to the guaranteed margin profit, the Federal Reserve buys back Treasuries from banks via its Permanent Open Market Operations (POMO). Since Bond prices have gone up for most of the year, this is another profit source for banks. Buy low, sell high. Another government guaranteed trade.
Where do all the profits go? Look around! A rising tide lifts all boats. Domestic stocks, international stocks (NYSEArca: VEU - News), emerging market stocks (NYSEArca: EEM - News), broad bond funds (NYSEArca: AGG - News) and commodities (NYSEArca: DBC - News) are all up.
Fly in the Ointment
All things come to an end eventually. Even this perfectly legal and unethical enrichment cycle the banks are feasting on.
30-Year T-Bonds were the first to decouple themselves from the liquidity rally. They topped on August 25 and have been going down since. On that very day, the ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter stated that: 'Our technical analysis along with fundaments suggest that T-Bonds are getting ready to roll over.'
Shortly thereafter, Bill Gross stated that the 30-year bond bull market is over. Lower bond prices mean higher bond interest rates. When interest rates rise, investors become less inclined to 'gamble' with stocks.
And regarding the POMO repurchase profit racket, lower bond prices mean smaller profits for banks which translates into less money to drive up stocks and commodities. This alone probably won't be a big enough knock against the liquidity house of cards, but every crash has to start somewhere - bonds may be the beginning.
Gold, Silver, Commodities and Inflation
Throughout much of 2008, 2009 and 2010, gold, silver and stocks have been moving in the same direction. That direction was usually the opposite of the U.S. dollar. A weak dollar means rising stocks and vice versa.
If you look carefully, you'll see that the dollar has found support around current levels, which coincided with a correction in gold (NYSEArca: GLD - News) and silver (NYSEArca: SLV - News). In fact, gold has been correcting even though stocks have continued to rise. It's said that a fragmented market is an unhealthy market.
This doesn't mean the patient (= various markets) can't live (= rise) longer, but it is an early warning sign.
Short-Term Effects of QE2
Leading up to today's Fed meeting, stocks have been rallying. If you believe 'buy the rumor and sell the news' will be the case, that's exactly the behavior you'd expect to see. Once the news is released, the big question is whether investors feel they actually got the steak or just the sizzle.
Sentiment is extreme enough where a 'sizzle-induced' disappointment could lead to a correction - a correction bigger than many expect.
Of course, there are many who believe that the ueber-bullish presidential election year cycle (October ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter, page 4) will kick in and propel stocks for the foreseeable future.
Either way, we find ourselves at a very important juncture. The stock market has drawn a few lines in the sand, or trigger levels. A breakout above trigger levels will lead to the next resistance, while a drop below support may open the floodgates.

The Pros and Cons of QE2 - Yahoo! Finance


Bing Translator


questo mi piace , gran bel articolo. :up:

certo potrei fare qualche appunto , ma questo si suol dire avere le idee chiare ....

have an opinion
 

lukas

Forumer storico
L'ultima volta che abbiamo visto settembre e ottobre entrambi positivi è stato nel 2007............

Il Nasdaq 100 dopo 3 anni rivede la vetta e questo dà modo ai fondi e ai big player che hanno sbagliato tutto di tornare in pareggio e chiudere le posizioni
...se io avessi in cassa migliaia di apple,goggle,yahoo,ebay ecc, non ci penserei 2 volte

1289319169nasdaq100.gif
 

lukas

Forumer storico
Ho trovato un'altro punto di vista sul mercato ,lo incollo ,qui sotto ....
...sul target non faccio commenti , mi sembra davvero impossibile, quindi non chiedete a mè....
lo posto perchè quello che dice in questo articolo è sempre ben motivato e svela alcune cose molto interessanti , che del resto sappiamo tutti e che non si possono ignorare per sempre.
Karl Denninger Sees Dow at 3,000 Next Year


picture-7293.jpg

Submitted by madhedgefundtrader on 11/15/2010 11:41 -0500


http://www.investireoggi.it/taxonomy_vtn/term/9053



Karl Denninger of Market Ticker thinks there is a secondary banking crisis around the corner that will trigger a cascading collapse in the stock market, and another government bailout. TARP 3 anyone? We could reach 3,000 in the Dow and 300 in the S&P 500.
This is one of many controversial and incendiary opinions about the state of the global financial markets Karl voiced to me in a wide ranging interview on Hedge Fund Radio. Karl says the idea that we are going back to an S&P 500 earnings of $105-$110 a share in the face of the soaring cost input factors is totally laughable.
Bernanke is making the same mistake we saw in 1933. The nightmare scenario for him is a coincident dollar and stock market selloff. The risk of hyperinflation will force him to back off on easy money. If the market goes up by 30% and the dollar devalues by 30%, then you haven’t made any money. When cost push pressures show up, corporate earnings are going to disappear. Companies like Kimberly Clark are reporting the largest raw material cost increases in history. Even Apple is seeing cost push problems.
“Foreclosure Gate” will be much worse than expected. There is upwards of $200 billion worth of exposure just on the “put back side”. The large banks also have second line exposure on their own balance sheets that is at least as big, if not bigger. In dollar terms, interest income has been good, but their spreads have been collapsing.
Banks problems may become impossible to hide in 3-6 months. They are passing around the losses trying to hide the truth. Banks made their earnings in the recent quarter by taking down reserves. Not providing for these risks is absolute fancy.
The 900 pound gorilla in the room is the second line problem, which is mostly concentrated in the top banks, including (BAC), (C ), (JPM), (WFC). Industry wide, only $1 trillion of $3.5 trillion in real estate losses has been realized, and at some point, someone is going to have to swallow. Wells Fargo is the most leveraged, could be the first to go, with $1 trillion in off balance sheet exposure, including all of the garbage they took in from Wachovia.
Are you wondering why financials have done so poorly this year? Investors are still laboring under the false premise that these firms are too big to fail and that the government won’t let anything bad happen to them. It is assumed that in the worst case, they will see flat earnings and no EPS growth for the next couple of years. Karl thinks that is incredibly naïve. The big pension funds that own most of these stocks are going to get hosed.
The majority of money has been made in the bond market. Karl hates to buy near a top.
Commodities are starting to look scary. The “softs” have delivered parabolic moves which never end well. Oil breaking through $100 could be the triggering event for the corporate margins crash which takes the stock market down. Break $87 and it’s off to the races. This will cause tremendous damage to the economy. Then bring in the “RISK OFF” trade, because everything will go down, starting sometime in 2011.
Until then, you can day trade, play in the futures market, and make plenty of money. Just keep everything on a tight leash. Stay away from positions that are hard to get out of. Dollar strength could be the key triggering event. Europe could also be another. And then there are potential black swan events, like state attorney generals halting the foreclosure process.
Karl believes the technology sector is very over extended. Apple (AAPL) is now 20% of PowerShares QQQ Trust (QQQQ). Apple’s success is attracting competition. Google Android sales have suddenly rocketed, a tectonic ship for the market. LG and Samsung are more attractive than Google (GOOG) or Apple, because they supply the processors and screens. Intel at $20 doesn’t look bad, especially if it breaks the 200 day moving average to the upside. In so many areas in the tech world he loves the companies but hates the prices.
Karl Denninger is the publisher of the daily blog, Market Ticker. He was the CEO and one of the founders of MCSNet, a Chicago area Internet and networking company which he sold in 1998. Since then, Karl has been a successful independent trader. In 2007, he started posting Market Ticker, a highly entertaining and prescient, if not irreverent daily blog. He also created TicketForum, an online trading forum. In 2008, Karl received the Reed Irvine Accuracy In Media Award for Grassroots Journalism for his coverage of the market meltdown. To learn more about Karl Denninger, you can visit his website at http://market-ticker.org/ . To listen to my lively interview with Karl on Hedge Fund Radio in full, please click here at (insert link to radio show).
To see the data, charts, and graphs that support this research piece, as well as more iconoclastic and out-of-consensus analysis, please visit me at www.madhedgefundtrader.com . There, you will find the conventional wisdom mercilessly flailed and tortured daily, and my last two years of research reports available for free. You can also listen to me on Hedge Fund Radio by clicking on “This Week on Hedge Fund Radio” in the upper right corner of my home page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Alto